I’ve ridiculed the “water cops” idea (see this, this and this) for a long time.

1. They are a fascist mechanism — telling you want to do, when and where.
2. They are a visible form of “education” more than an effective way of increasing water conservation.
3. They divert resources from more pressing matters. (Even though I bet they are considered “green collar jobs”).

And now we get the cost of cops in San Diego [p 497 of this pdf]: $752,370 for 10 FTE positions.* (I doubt that includes their transport costs, since they probably drive fleet cars.)

Note the revenue associated with these cops: $0.

Now, I know that cops are supposed to be valuable because they promote water conservation, by their very existence and/or the threat of a fine, but I’d prefer a more-direct mechanism: Raising the price of water.

Higher water prices:

1. Don’t tell you what to do; you choose when and where to use water, and pay accordingly.
2. Are something we’ve learned how to respond to LONG ago — by using less.
3. Cost nothing. In fact, they generate revenue.

So why does the City of San Diego (and others) have water cops?

• They prefer to make noise and then impose rationing when it doesn’t work.
• They don’t really want to sell less water (because revenue falls).
• They are bureaucrats who prefer to tell people what to do.

I’d like to hear a better reason. Anyone? Buehler?

Bottom Line: Fire these cops and rehire them to read meters that are billing water at higher prices. They will actually be useful.